Pages

Showing posts with label MACD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MACD. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Crude Oil To Be Pressured; Gold On The Rise

It's looking like crude oil prices are positioned to take a fall in the short-term, while gold is aiming for further gains following post-election declines.

StockCharts.com
A look at the last six months for WTI shows a pretty good number of reasons to be bearish. Since about the beginning of December we've been in a bearish pennant, with resistance around $54 reached at the turn of the new year and support now around $52, built around short-term lows throughout the last two months. This pennant is outlined in thin black lines. Tuesday's trading brought us very near a breakout point lower, with session lows right on the line of support on that pennant. What really matters is where we close, though.

Speaking of closing prices, WTI managed to close a hair above the 50-day SMA, prominently shown on the right panel of the above image. As of this typing, crude oil futures for March delivery are down roughly 1.1% to $51.59 a barrel, not only below Tuesday's close but also below Tuesday's session lows. This bodes well for Wednesday being our breakout point lower below the 50-day SMA line and possibly breaking the pennant as well, barring any positive shocks/news.

StockCharts.com
While crude oil looks for a break lower, gold is slowly but surely regaining ground lost after the election, when risk-off was the status quo. With that risk-off sentiment now abating as the new administration starts off on some shaky footing in some cases, gold is back in the crosshairs of investors. Long-term resistance was broken initially on Monday's close, and confirmed by Tuesday's open and close above that black resistance line.

I'm personally expecting the 'Trump trade' to continue slowing as the honeymoon phase ends and investors realize that significant tax reform and fiscal policy changes will not be immediate. This seems like a good time to jump into gold, so long as the dollar rally continues to stall along with the general Trump trade/risk-off sentiment.

Andrew

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Dow Jones Industrials Looking Distressed

I'm entering the fifth week of being contaminated by some kind of illness. This time, it's a nasty cold that developed last Thursday, and gave me a fever every day this past weekend, into Monday morning. That was accompanied by an incredibly sore throat, cough, and inordinate amounts of post-nasal drop. Not exactly the most fun way to spend a weekend, but thankfully it looks like things are turning a corner.
A handful of technical indicators on the Dow Jones Industrial Average are flashing warning signs that the market might be slightly distressed.

StockCharts.com
Attached above is a picture of the Dow Jones Industrials over the last six months, with the Average Directional Index (ADX) posted below. The +DI (Positive Directional Index) and -DI (Negative Directional Index) are superimposed on the ADX. In a nutshell, an ADX value over 20 generally indicates the presence of a trend in the market. Using the ADX alone, one can't determine the direction of the trend without looking at the values of the stock or index. The Directional Indexes help out by separating the ADX into positive and negative components. When the ADX exceeds 20 and the +DI is greater than the -DI, the trend of the security is generally positive/upward. Likewise, when the ADX exceeds 20 and the -DI value is greater than the +DI value, the trend of the security is generally negative/downward. This is by no means foolproof, but can be a guide to identifying trends and momentum, to some degree.
The ADX has been stuck in a pretty tight range since middle September, eyeballing it says it's hovering between roughly a 22-27 value window. Although the index has stagnated, it remains above 20, and therefore it is plausible that a trend still exists in the market. How can there be a trend if the Dow is stuck in a sideways pattern, you ask? Well, that's the gist of it. The trend is for the sideways pattern to continue, it would appear, as has been the case since last month. When taking into account the Directional indexes, we get a different story. Since mid/late August, the -DI line has consistently been above the +DI line, save for a brief come-together in late September. This was not a red flag back in August and early/mid September, because the ADX was below that key 20 threshold. However, it's been about a full month that the ADX has been above the 20 mark, and the -DI line has exceeded the +DI line. This has bearish implications for the Dow, and while there's nothing from this particular index screaming "correction" in the very near future, this indicator is raising the possibility that a correction cannot be ruled out down the road. A sideways trend with -DI exceeding +DI isn't something I'm fond of.

StockCharts.com
We now turn to another indicator, using the same 6-month timeframe as the ADX analysis. This time, we're looking at the Moving Average Convergence/Divergence Oscillator, or the MACD. This is a momentum oscillator, and will work in tandem with our ADX analysis above. The MACD, while a wonderful indicator, is also a rather complicated indicator to learn, given the number of crossover signals and such that can be learned. For this analysis, we will be focusing solely on the positivity or negativity of the MACD line itself (black line). In a nutshell, when the MACD value is positive, the momentum for a gain in the security is increasing. Taking this point further, a strongly positive MACD value can predict a strong upward breakout, whereas a weakly positive MACD value may anticipate weak gains or even stagnation. Similarly, when the MACD value is negative, the momentum for a loss in the security is increasing. A strongly negative MACD value may anticipate a large drop in the security's value, whereas a weakly negative MACD value may predict small losses or stagnation.
Something right off the bat that worries me is that the MACD has been negative since early September. This implies that there is more momentum for the index to lose value than to gain value. However, as we saw with the ADX, we are stuck in a rather small window, and in order for the MACD or ADX to succeed in anticipating this downward momentum, we need something to break out of the small window. Perhaps a series of worse-than-expected earnings, as we're in the thick of earnings season, or some other shock to the system. Those kinds of things can't really be anticipated, but when a breakout does occur, the MACD agrees that a downward movement is more likely than an upward movement.

Of course, we can't discuss stress in the market and not bring up everyone's favorite fear gauge.
StockCharts.com
The CBOE's Volatility Index, or VIX, is Wall Street's 'fear gauge', measuring volatility in the markets. When investors get jittery and uncertainty over the future increases, the VIX goes up. When markets are calm and the economy's looking good, the VIX goes down. As of the day this post was written (Tuesday), the VIX closed at 13.46, about where it's been since this past spring. That's something that I find a bit concerning.
As we described above, when volatility is low and investors are calm, the VIX is down. When you take into account that the 52-week range of the VIX currently stands at a high of 32.09 and a low of 11.02, you don't need a financial analyst to tell you that investors are pretty complacent with economic conditions right now. In some aspects, this is good; stock markets generally stay up during calm periods, enabling a prolonged, slow appreciation of capital if this calm period were to extend into the longer term. In other aspects, this is not good; investors are a little too complacent right now. The Federal Reserve is well on its way to boosting interest rates, either in its November or December meetings (likely the latter), and while experts are pricing this likelihood in, I don't believe the stock markets are doing the same. To some degree, this is warranted, as the FOMC has lost some credibility in the last few meetings after building up the case for a rate hike and then keeping rates steady. Despite this, I believe a correction will occur at some point if/when the markets realize that interest rates could very well rise in December. It shouldn't be a big correction, but at least a few days in the red ought to accurately price in a rate hike.

Another thing to discuss concerning the VIX is the Relative Strength Indicator, or RSI, placed above the VIX price chart. The RSI is an indicator of whether a security is overbought or underbought. Values above that dashed line at 70 indicate a security is overbought and a pullback in value can be expected soon. Similarly, values below the dashed line at 30 indicate the security is underbought, and a rise in value can be expected in the near future. The 'neutral' line is at 50, so anything between 50 and 70 generally is accurately priced but perhaps a bit too pricey, while anything between 30 and 50 is generally accurately priced but perhaps a bit too cheap for its real value. The VIX stands at about 46 at Tuesday's close, below the neutral line of 50 but not below the 'underbought' line of 30. In other words, volatility is about where it should be based on recent history, but might be just a bit too low. The RSI isn't perfect of course, but it's one of the more accurate technical indicators. Using the RSI, the VIX should be watched for a slight short-term boost.

Lastly, we apply the ADX we discussed earlier to the VIX. I'll save you the trouble of re-explaining the ADX and +/-DI, as it's all explained at the beginning of this post, so we'll just analyze the chart. The +DI line has exceeded the -DI line ever since the first few days of September, up until the last couple of days before this writing. Over the last few days, we've seen the -DI and +DI switching back and forth, seemingly fighting over which is more dominant. In a situation like this, I would call it neutral. But it doesn't really matter too much because the ADX itself (black line) is below that key 20 threshold, indicating there isn't really a trend present for the -DI and +DI lines to anticipate momentum. The momentum recently has been negative, and while that momentum and the trend are currently neutral, it could very well return and place continued upward pressure on the VIX.

Lastly, adding on to this theme of losing momentum and being stuck in a sideways pattern, let's check out just how low volatility has been, using numbers.
TradingViews
Shown above is the Dow Jones Industrials over the last year, with two price change windows on the right side of the chart. The larger window is where I measured the range in index values from highest close/open to lowest close/open. Since mid-August, a period of about 2 months, the Dow has varied by 626 points, or 3.36%. That's not much of a move at all, when looking at other 2-month periods over the last year. Applying the same method to the last month and a half, we get the Dow varying by 320 points, or 1.74%. These two price changes, particularly the window over the last month and a half, show this pattern we've been stuck in. The Dow Jones has been moving sideways on this chart, hence the 'sideways pattern' references. While there is downward pressure on stocks as we described above, until we get out of this pattern there's really nothing that can be done. Thus, we're waiting for an event that triggers either an upward breakout, such as a slew of much better-than-expected earnings from big companies, or a downward breakout, such as a series of poor earnings and a decrease in economic conditions. Time will tell just when this breakout happens, but until then, it's a waiting game. Which direction will it go? What will be the trigger for the breakout? Those two questions are at the forefront of my mind for the medium term.

Andrew

Saturday, October 1, 2016

Deutsche Bank: TBTF Edition

Over this past summer, I had the pleasure of reading Andrew Ross Sorkin's book 'Too Big To Fail', a beautiful reconstruction of the financial crisis at its roots. The book claims to have been based off of many interviews & previously-secret pieces of knowledge, and the material inside confirms it; it really is a fascinating book about the crisis.
The other day, I received in the mail another book titled 'Too Big To Fail', this one penned by Gary Stern and Ron Feldman, published in 2004. This book was essentially the 'warning shot' for the 2008 financial crisis, as it spoke of the dangers of bank bailouts. I have yet to dive into the book, but I'm very eager to do so. Aside from all the literature, while we thought the era of TBTF was more-or-less over, if not heavily reduced, Deutsche Bank this week proved that this is not the case.

Yahoo Finance
Attached from Yahoo Finance is a chart of Deutsche Bank's stock price from somewhere early in the trading session Tuesday, to the end of the trading session Friday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is superimposed in green. You don't have to have a paid subscription to fancy charts and graphs to tell that DB was under some intense pressure both Thursday and Friday.

Thursday was not a good day for the banking sector. Two prominent events contributed to this general malaise, the first stemming from Commerzbank and the second from Deutsche Bank. Commerzbank announced that it would be eliminating nearly 10,000 jobs and suspending dividends for its stock on Thursday, news that sent a chill throughout the financial markets. This news came about prior to the start of the trading day, if my phone alerts are to be believed, and more or less set the tone for the financial sector before the American trading had even begun.

Trading kicked off for Deutsche Bank on Thursday pretty stationary from where it had closed Wednesday, hovering right around $12.25 per share. However, at around 12:20 PM ET Thursday, word got out that a handful of hedge funds were either pondering, or already commencing a cut in exposure to Deutsche Bank. This, of course, is not what investors wanted to hear, after the news about Commerzbank was already promoting a little more Advil than normal on this trading day. In a span of 40 minutes, from 12:20 PM to 1:00 PM ET, Deutsche Bank's stock plummeted from $12.22 per share to $11.39 per share, a 5.37% drop. The Dow responded similarly, dropping from 18,315 points to 18,151 points in that same timeframe. It eventually scraped the 18,100 mark right before 2 PM, but bounced back to close down over a hundred points on the day.

There are a lot of editorials out there with far more knowledge and experience than I possess, and that's fine; ideal, actually, as it gives people like me an opportunity to keep learning. And something that's been made a point of in some of these articles is that Deutsche Bank may remain Too Big To Fail. The financial markets certainly believe that; the CBOE'S VIX index jumped over two points in that same 40-minute time span we looked at above.

The nice thing here, though, is that this isn't Lehman Brothers 2.0. You'll notice that DB is sitting on a large quantity of cash reserves, has bonds that can be converted into equity if needed, and after Lehman in 2008, as well as observing the current state of our global economy, it would be nonsense to even imply that a bank as significant as Deutsche Bank would be allowed to fail. Deutsche is not Lehman 2.0, and is far from it.

StockCharts.com

After Thursday's scare, Friday brought a heavy dose of optimism back to the overall market, and especially Deutsche Bank. Its stock ended the day just over $13, a jump of over 10% compared to its Thursday closing price. This jump came on the heels of reports that the US government's settlement with the bank may come in around $4-6 billion, a fraction of the ~$14 billion charge initially levied against Deutsche Bank. I'm practically hitting my head on the wall at how I didn't realize that the settlement would be lower than the initial charge, leading to a rally like this; the bears got trapped and the bulls are running free in Deutsche Bank's stock, for now.

Technical indicators like the MACD and Bollinger Bands as portrayed above indicate that another, certainly more modest drop could be in the cards over the next couple days until the MACD crosses above the signal line again. What might be a bit alarming is how even despite Deutsche Bank's stock hitting an all-time low Thursday, it still stayed within the Bollinger Bands, which delineate the +2 and -2 standard deviations. Friday's rally has brought the price back just below the middle of these Bollinger Bands, but when you put together the still-iffy MACD and now-very-wide Bollinger Bands, a non-zero chance for further selling remains. I don't see it anywhere as severe as Thursday's selloff, but similar to the gradual downward trend we've seen since about May, depicted in the chart above.


Deutsche Bank is a Too Big To Fail bank, but it's a strong TBTF bank compared to the position Lehman Brothers was in when they started taking big beatings from hedge funds cutting exposure. Even if, for whatever reason, DB ended up needing government assistance to survive, common sense all but guarantees the bank would not go under, unless the end goal here was another significant shock to the system, and we know no one wants that.

Andrew